Human Cloning


Human Cloning

Human Cloning debate: Why do it? Why do it? Who’d be hurt? Should it be Legal?

Peter Kendall

Summary
Cloning is a technique of producing humans, animals or plans without natural biological process. A sterile (who is unable to give birth of child) father can make a biological child. When the cloning was used in Scotland in a sheep it brought a debate. Whether cloning to human to not. By this we can make exact photocopy of parent. Since when cloning was possible in animals could be applied ion human or not. By this we can .Since when cloning was possible in animals could be applied in human beings as well. Ethically cloning is taken as morally wrong. There is a moral question that: Can cloning to human a legal work?

The parent who are unable to have natural child, without taking others eggs or sperm, can be parents of children by using cloning system. There is an identity problem because all the products look exactly the same. It is the time parents (people) make babies not are babies using reproductive technology because a perfect baby can be made without sexual intercourse between a couple. People can choose special qualities for their children by cloning process.
The writer also argues that, there is no a moral question or problems making a clone to bone marrow (damaged bone) transplantation. Still if a baby is made from cloning there is a question on quality because exact quality can't be reproduced. This is because we can't make Abraham Lincoln taking genes from dried blood and skull. No doubt, reproduction of animal or human can be made but that can't be of original qualities. But some extinct species like dinosaurs and birds can be saved through cloning process. Since there is similarities in physical and mental structure of the products of cloning there can't be special extra quality and no more different among people. The issue of cloning is still on debate where and how it is useful and when and where can it be curse as well.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Questions and Answers of ‘My Mother Never Worked’

  Questions and Answers of ‘My Mother Never Worked’ Comprehension 1.      What kind of work did Martha Smith do while her children were growing up? List     some of the chores she performed.        Martha Smith worked very hard at raising her children, doing farm chores, and               maintaining a household, but she did not work outside the home for pay-the only              kind of work recognized by the government.   2.      Why aren’t Martha Smith’s survivors entitled to a death benefit when their mother dies?     According to the government, Martha Smith is not eligible for a death benefit because she was never employed.   3.      How does the government define work?       The government defines work as an activity performed for compensation.   Purpose and Audience   1.      What point is the writer trying to make? Why do you suppose her thesis is never       explicitly stated?       The essay’s thesis is that although Martha Smith did not work out
Read more

Questions and Answers of 'The Case Against Air Conditioning'

Image
              Questions and Answers of 'The Case Against Air Conditioning ' Comprehension 1.      What does Cox think is wrong with air conditioning? Ans: Cox says that air conditioning uses a lot of energy; running air conditioners burns fossil fuels, which emits greenhouse gases that raise global temperatures, which in turn increases the need for air conditioning. He believes that air conditioning should be used more sparingly. 2.     According to Cox, what would be the results of a largely “A.C.-free Washington” (3)? Does the scenario he outlines apply only to Washington, DC? Only to urban areas? Does it apply to other parts of the countries as well? Ans: cox says that reduced air conditioning use in Washington would result in more flexible work schedules (business, including governmental ones, closing and adjusting for heat), renovation for buildings to better accommodate heat, decreased use of heat-generating   appliances, and increased socialization resulting f
Read more

Summary of 'The Case Against Air Conditioning

  The Case Against Air Conditioning The author’s message is that A.C. keeps us inside and away from interacting with one another. We shouldn’t be trapped inside everyday but we should be out and about to enjoy the world around us. This essay is about why Washington/America should stop using air conditioners in everyday life with the expectation of hospitals, archives, and cooling centers. The author supports his argument by providing examples of wat Washington would look like without air conditioners at work, at home, and around town. Cox’s starts out with using modern day examples of people using air conditioning to beat the Heat and why it is bad. Cox’s wants readers to turn down, turn off, or just complete eliminate air conditioning use. He believes that it will benefit us by making neighborhoods more friendly, laws more lax, and climate change less of an issue. People in Washington didn’t have to experience extreme heat because their houses were equipped with air condition
Read more