Human cloning


Should we allow Scientists to use cloning to try to develop cures for specific disease for examples Alzheimer’s disease? Write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper that states your position on this subject.
Kirtipur, Kathmandu
August 30, 2011
The Editor,
The Kathmandu post
Kathmandu Nepal
Dear Sir,
I would like to provide some ideas about this debatable subject cloning with the help of your newspaper. Could you please publish this article in your upcoming publication?
When the success of cloning came in animals there is a question about whether it should be used to make human being or not. There are both positive and negative aspects of cloning. If this system is used in artificial reproductive system of is too bad. There is no value of married life and physical relation between opposite sexes. Almost all people will physically and mentally similar. There can’t be any extra skills and talent in such production like broiler chickens. If all the people are like Mr. x, there is no individual quality and identity. We can’t find the fitted people for different skills and works. Practically, socially, culturally, personally and mentally cloning in place of natural reproduction should be illegal and banned.
On the other hand this new scientific technology should be adopted in curing various diseases like Alzheimer’s disease. Bone marrow transplantation, replacing damage parts of our body. For the therapeutically purpose can be beneficial and should be applied. There can be multiple advantageous uses of doing regarding diseases. Besides, to save the going to be extinct animals, plant species etc. the cloning technology could be used. For this purpose cloning may provide many advantages in fast production, economic production and to some extent quality production. There are high chances of correcting our damaged cells or parts replacing healthy ones by cloning device. Scientific discoveries have reached to great extent that should be properly and creatively utilized in disease and physical weaknesses (deformity).
Thus I would like to inform to all public via your media to have proper utilization of cloning in human being. If it is aptly used, it is great boom if Science otherwise it will be curse if it is being used in place of natural human reproductive process. We must be alert before using cloning.
Your sincerely
Ramesh Basnet


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Questions and Answers of ‘My Mother Never Worked’

  Questions and Answers of ‘My Mother Never Worked’ Comprehension 1.      What kind of work did Martha Smith do while her children were growing up? List     some of the chores she performed.        Martha Smith worked very hard at raising her children, doing farm chores, and               maintaining a household, but she did not work outside the home for pay-the only              kind of work recognized by the government.   2.      Why aren’t Martha Smith’s survivors entitled to a death benefit when their mother dies?     According to the government, Martha Smith is not eligible for a death benefit because she was never employed.   3.      How does the government define work?       The government defines work as an activity performed for compensation.   Purpose and Audience   1.      What point is the writer trying to make? Why do you suppose her thesis is never       explicitly stated?       The essay’s thesis is that although Martha Smith did not work out
Read more

Questions and Answers of 'The Case Against Air Conditioning'

Image
              Questions and Answers of 'The Case Against Air Conditioning ' Comprehension 1.      What does Cox think is wrong with air conditioning? Ans: Cox says that air conditioning uses a lot of energy; running air conditioners burns fossil fuels, which emits greenhouse gases that raise global temperatures, which in turn increases the need for air conditioning. He believes that air conditioning should be used more sparingly. 2.     According to Cox, what would be the results of a largely “A.C.-free Washington” (3)? Does the scenario he outlines apply only to Washington, DC? Only to urban areas? Does it apply to other parts of the countries as well? Ans: cox says that reduced air conditioning use in Washington would result in more flexible work schedules (business, including governmental ones, closing and adjusting for heat), renovation for buildings to better accommodate heat, decreased use of heat-generating   appliances, and increased socialization resulting f
Read more

Summary of 'The Case Against Air Conditioning

  The Case Against Air Conditioning The author’s message is that A.C. keeps us inside and away from interacting with one another. We shouldn’t be trapped inside everyday but we should be out and about to enjoy the world around us. This essay is about why Washington/America should stop using air conditioners in everyday life with the expectation of hospitals, archives, and cooling centers. The author supports his argument by providing examples of wat Washington would look like without air conditioners at work, at home, and around town. Cox’s starts out with using modern day examples of people using air conditioning to beat the Heat and why it is bad. Cox’s wants readers to turn down, turn off, or just complete eliminate air conditioning use. He believes that it will benefit us by making neighborhoods more friendly, laws more lax, and climate change less of an issue. People in Washington didn’t have to experience extreme heat because their houses were equipped with air condition
Read more